Hastings Alliance - saving the Combe Valley
Home Contact us

What is the Hastings Alliance?
Join us
Make a donation
Combe Haven Valley
The arguments
Timetable
Supporters
Pictures
Further resources

County Council's Link Road Leaflet “misleading and inaccurate” claims Hastings Alliance [1]

Destroying the environment to build the Newbury bypass
"The Newbury bypass increased local traffic by 48%
in just 4 years"

Speaking for the Hastings Alliance (a coalition of local and national organisations opposed to the BHLR), its chairman Nick Bingham said:

“The leaflet glosses over the environmental damage the road will bring about, fails to mention that BHLR will lead to more, not less, traffic in Hastings and Bexhill, and in doing so will dump an extra annual 5,426 tonnes of greenhouse gas CO2 into the atmosphere at a time when climate change is supposedly at the top of local and national governments’ agendas. All this is admitted by East Sussex County Council (ESCC) in its own studies, then conveniently ignored in its leaflet.[2]

“The complete absence of any information in the leaflet on alternatives to the car, and the many other ways to reduce traffic, confirms what the Alliance, and expert consultants have said repeatedly; that ESCC other BHLR supporters have failed to properly examine alternatives to car travel. It’s a very serious matter and shameful when Hastings has a high level (39%) of households with no access to a car. BHLR is a seriously flawed road scheme.”

The Hastings Alliance believe that the BHLR is far from inevitable and that it has to be stopped. Nick Bingham concluded:

“The less than competent process followed by ESCC and others in developing the BHLR should be exposed. Unbelieveably, there has never been any evidence put forward by those promoting the road to show that it is the best solution for Hastings and Bexhill, simply a blind adherence to the mantra that ‘it’s a good thing’. If there is evidence, it should be published because we all need to see it. The only alternatives ever placed in front of the public have been other routes for BHLR that would never have been approved because of legal protection. In this respect, the consultation was manipulative, stupid, or both. We are all being conned into accepting a very poor and damaging road which will carry local traffic of 30,000 vehicles a day through a beautiful valley that is one of Hastings and Bexhill’s greatest amenities, before dumping it back in the towns’ built up areas.”

Notes for Editor:

Hastings Alliance constituent groups and organisations; document reference:

1. Local: Friends of the Brede Valley, Hastings Friends of the Earth, Friends of the Earth South East, East Sussex Transport 2000, Hastings Urban Wildlife, Sussex Wildlife Trust, Railfuture Coastway Group, Council for the Protection of Rural England – Sussex, SUSTRANS, Wishing Tree Residents Association.

National: CPRE, Friends of the Earth, Greenpeace, Railfuture, Royal Society for the Protection of Birds, SUSTRANS, Transport 2000, The Wildlife Trusts, Woodland Trust, Worldwide Fund for Nature,.

2. ESCC Local Transport Plan, Major Scheme Bid, BHLR July 2004.

News
1 June 2007 Fighting the proposed link road - update June 2008
28 October 2007 Hastings Alliance on TV
7 August 2007 Hastings Alliance's own objection as submitted to the council in August 2007
7 October 2007 Natural England officially objects to proposed road
14 September 2007 Over 1800 objections received by the Council
20 July 2007 Environment Agency objects to proposed road
25 May 2007 Plans officially unveiled - objection period starts
14 May 2007 Council could have forseen costs of flooding work
6 March 2007 Call to re-think
6 March 2007 Alternatives not properly considered
27 February 2007 Cost of proposed link road has nearly doubled
27 December 2006 Countryside agency ignoring own report
5 September 2006 Press Release: County Council's Link Road Leaflet "misleading and inaccurate"
4 July 2006 Press Release: New roads are creating massive traffic growth
12 June 2006 Proposals for Junction to A21